Jul02
twitter, facebook, word of mouth
Facebook is dead. And so is Twitter.
An interesting argument was made by Dustin Clingman, a local game designer, at the DMAF’s “State-of-the-Digital Media-Industry” event in Orlando.
He makes the point that Twitter, unlike Facebook, has positioned itself as an extremely efficient method for spreading out information with global context. He makes his point by asking the question, “Who found out about Michael Jackson being dead on Facebook?“
In his comparison of the two platforms, from a mass-communications standpoint, I totally agree with his point that “Facebook is dead”.
However, I think his comparison is short-sighted in a couple of regards and is clearly from the stand point of a non-marketer.
For one, Twitter has lost alot of it’s trust factor. It’s becoming a very noisy platform that’s been infiltrated by unscrupulous marketers, get rich quick schemes, hackers, hoaxsters and hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of bots (no one, not even Twitter knows the extent of this problem). Following the death of Michael Jackson, who found out that Jeff Goldblum, Ellen Degeneres, and Britney Spears had died on Facebook? These claims were all over Twitter, yet were all completely false.
Secondly, Dustin has failed to factor in the huge marketing potential that Facebook provides—the potential for word of mouth marketing in groups of friends with an implicit level of trust that’s unparalleled on other social platforms. According to a recent study by eMarketer, 34% of US Internet users bought a product based on a recommendation from a friend or relative. Compare this to a mere 5% who were influenced by a blogger (or micro-blogger).
So while were doing comparisons, from a social media trust and WOM standpoint, I believe that “Twitter is dead”.
Posted by Jeremy Hilton on Jul. 02, 2009
For me, twitter is a news source, Facebook is a personal/friends chat room. I like both and I don’‘t see either going away.
Posted by Mark Baratelli on 07/03/2009 05:36 PM